Esta entrada es de un grupo sugerido
We just continue to spiral downward

Here’s the real headline: the Louisiana v. Callais decision didn’t erase the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but it made one of its most important tools harder to use. That tool is Section 2, the part of the law used to challenge voting maps and systems that weaken Black voting power.
For years, Section 2 was how communities proved that even if a law didn’t say “race,” the outcome still hurt Black voters. That’s how districts were redrawn, how representation was corrected, and how some balance was enforced. Now the bar to prove that harm just got higher.
What does that mean in plain terms? It means maps that may dilute Black voting strength are now harder to challenge. It means cases take longer, cost more, and are less likely to win. It means the system didn’t remove protection, it made protection harder to reach.
This didn’t happen overnight. Th…







