They Keep Rebuilding Columbus Without Rebuilding Black Ownership

People keep asking why some Black communities do not trust the word “development.” Because historically development has not always meant ownership, protection, or long term stability for the people already living there. In Columbus, entire Black neighborhoods were permanently altered through highway construction, institutional expansion, urban renewal projects, rising land values, and outside investment. Bronzeville is one of the clearest examples. A once thriving Black business and cultural corridor was fractured as I-71 cut directly through the community, displacing families, reducing economic circulation, weakening property ownership, and changing the future of the area for generations. Many Black families never fully recovered from that loss of land, businesses, and neighborhood continuity. Now look at what continues happening around downtown Columbus today. Areas once ignored for years suddenly become “prime development corridors.” Old buildings disappear. Property taxes rise. Rent rises. Investors arrive. Institutions expand. Luxury and mixed income projects appear. But the deeper question rarely gets asked: who is actually building long term ownership from all of this growth? Because there is a major difference between being allowed to live somewhere temporarily and actually owning part of the future being built around you. A city can add billions in development while still leaving large numbers of Black residents disconnected from wealth creation. That is why simply seeing cranes, new apartments, or ribbon cuttings does not automatically impress everyone. Many communities have learned through experience that development can sometimes mean cultural erasure, displacement pressure, reduced affordability, and watching neighborhoods transform financially while longtime residents remain economically stuck. Columbus is growing rapidly, but growth alone is not the same thing as equity. The real measurement is not how many buildings go up. The real measurement is whether the people who endured the hardest years of the community are able to participate in the wealth, ownership, contracts, businesses, housing stability, and opportunities created by the transformation. Otherwise history simply repeats itself under a different slogan.


